52 Authors: Week 25 – Josef Skvorecky

Josef Škvorecký is perhaps not a famous author (or perhaps he is and I've just missed it). In any case, he died in 2012 and his works are not now easy to find in English in Europe. He was a Czech dissident who went into exile in 1968, after the Prague Spring, and got a job teaching American Literature at the University of Toronto. Alongside his day job, he was a comic novelist in Czech, many of whose works were readily available in English translation in the 1990s, when I carelessly assumed they always would be. Twenty years on, they seem (with one exception) to have passed out of print. Had I anticipated this, I would not so lightly have lent out or given away the paperbacks I had bought.

Those of his works I have read fall into three categories: historical novels, detective fiction, and semi-autobiographical novels.

In the last category, the author's alter ego is jazz-loving Danny Smiricky, but the stories also incorporate lightly fictionalised events from Czech history, which the author did not himself witness. The first of them is The Cowards (which does appear to be in print, in a 2010 Penguin edition), set at the end of the Second World War, with Danny a schoolboy in a jazz band (officially a folk band, jazz being musica non grata); it was banned on publication in Czech in the 1950s, and translated into English in 1970. This is followed by the more straight-forwardly autobiographical The Engineer of Human Souls, set in the aftermath of the Prague Spring; and by The Miracle Game, which centres on a fictionalised version of the 1949 Cihost Miracle, and the reopening of the investigation into it in 1968.

The historical novels are The Bride of Texas, based on accounts of Bohemians who served in the American Civil War (a dense work that I tried to read but found surprisingly tedious), and Dvorak in Love, about musical culture in New York during the years when Dvorak was working there and wrote his New World Symphony (which is very funny).

The works that I go back to again and again, though, are the detective stories. These are written more in the Agatha Christie than the Dashiell Hammett tradition, but under the shadow of a darker historical setting. The first Škvorecký I read was his collection Sins for Father Knox, in which the author invites the reader not only to solve the mystery, but to spot which prohibition from Ronald Knox's Decalogue of Detective Fiction has been contravened in the telling. The first to read though is The Mournful Demeanour of Lieutenant Boruvka, written in the years before the Prague Spring (and translated into English in 1973). This is a small taste:

The man took off his hat and an unruly tuft of hair stood up on his round head. He was Lieutenant Josef Boruvka and with him was his 17-year-old daughter Zuzana. His present plight was due to Zuzana's lust for foreign fields. In order to turn this desire to educational advantage, he had promised that if her school report turned out well they would spend a holiday together in Italy. He had however committed a fateful error, for he had neglected to define the term "turn out well". Consequently, after a hard struggle with his wife and daughter, he had been compelled to keep his promise although the report had comprised an abundance of Cs. … Lieutenant Boruvka took himself off gloomily to the Cedok travel agency. There had been a time when he too longed — in vain, such was the nature of the time — for foreign lands. Now, however, he had reached the age when a comfortable armchair in front of the goggle box was more attractive. Visualising lumpy beds in cheap hotels, and other hardships of foreign travel, he strode through the Prague streets in summer bloom, mentally calculating the amount that would be left in the family savings book after he had paid the cost of Zuzana's academic success. At the bottom of his heart he hoped that the foreign currency quota for the year would already have been exhausted. But the highest hopes are wont to be dashed.

The holiday in Italy, like so many in detective fiction, turns out to be a busman's holiday for the Czech homicide detective.

Post-1968, the stories take a darker turn, in the collection The End of Lieutenant Boruvka. Here's a passage of dialogue from the last story in the collection, "Pirates", between the detective and a friend's uncle, a dissident writer, who lives next door to a house where an old man has been murdered:

With great effort the old detective turned his attention from his private thoughts back to objective reality and said, "It's your neighbour. He's been murdered. And…," he lowered his whisper until it was scarcely audible, "I have reason to suspect — in fact I'm practically certain — that he worked for … for the organisation that I don't belong to. There was a bugging device in his flat. He was probably listening to what you were saying here when …"

"No matter," said the writer calmly. "There's already a microphone over there in the radiator and another one in the telephone."

The lieutenant was visibly shaken and the writer slapped himself on the forehead. "Oh Christ!" He lowered his voice to a whisper even less audible than the lieutenant's. "A thousand pardons. I guess they haven't got you on tape yet have they? The last thing I want to do is get you in trouble…."

He got up, took the phone off the hook, and tossed a thick blanket over the radiator. The lieutenant's knees began to tremble.

And here a passage of description from the same story:

They drove past wheat fields golden in the daytime, the colour of old gold now, at night, waving in the night breeze beneath the cherry trees that lined the road. They drove through woods where the black shadows of magnificent owls flitted among the trees. A moth landed on the lieutenant's nose, then flew away; the sergeant, hunched over the wheel of the Volga, pushed the motor to the limit and the lieutenant's loaded pistol dug into his hip. The countryside sped by the open windows, redolent of barns and manure piles, villages submerged in darkness and silence, a landscape of clover and lucerne, the lieutenant's landscape, with ponds reflecting a twisted moon, like the crumpled collages of one of those artists from the Dubcek era who later committed suicide — an ordinary suicide from an era of normalization. A landscape of fireflies and old, ancient history, a countryside where criminals were drawn and quartered at a time when the city of Memphis no longer existed and did not yet exist.

The afternoon before writing this I spent quizzing my oldest son in preparation for his school-leaving History exam, which covers the world since 1945. He didn't know the difference between the Prague Spring and the Velvet Revolution, and I felt very sad. As a historian I am wary of fiction as a gateway to historical understanding (I grit my teeth when I see novels recommended to homeschoolers as part of their History curriculum), but Škvorecký's writing certainly gave me a more sympathetic understanding of what it was like to live in the Eastern Bloc, and my first, hopeless, wish this afternoon was that I had encouraged my son to read Škvorecký months ago, so that he would have some imaginative and emotional hook for knowledge that to me seems so important.

—Paul has been reading the blog since 2008, when Janet drew his attention to a discussion about Brideshead Revisited. He currently trains translators in Brussels.


,

80 responses to “52 Authors: Week 25 – Josef Skvorecky”

  1. Grumpy

    Who wrote this?

  2. Grumpy

    I have always meant to read this guy

  3. Grumpy

    O really – I was guessing Craig! I knew it could not be an American because there is no school-leaving History exam, that I know of.
    I am interested that historians don’t like historical novels as a gate way to history! I once lent Lucy Becket’s novel about the dissolution of an English Cistercian monastery to a Cambridge church history don. He gave it back to me unread, with a wry smile, a year later. He could not force himself to read it. To me, a theologian, that ‘is’ history!
    My class read a play by Vaclav Havel last semester. They knew he had lived ‘under communism’ but that was the extent of it.

  4. Dang, I did it again–forgot to include the byline. Will fix right now.

  5. Robert Gotcher

    Someone should do Lucy Becket in this series. Just sayin’.

  6. I had never heard of this writer but I’d definitely like to try the detective stories.
    Had not heard of Lucy Becket either.

  7. Go right ahead, Robert.
    I gave away my copy of The Time Before You Die and that’s the only thing I had.
    AMDG

  8. Robert Gotcher

    I’ve only read Postcard from the Volcano, so I’m probably not qualified. I did meet LB once at Notre Dame. We had a nice conversation over dinner at the Center for Ethics and Culture conference. I like her views on education.

  9. Well, you can read more. I’ve read every book I’ve written about in the two months before I wrote about them.
    AMDG

  10. Used Skvorecky books seem plentiful on Amazon. I definitely want to read some.
    AMDG

  11. If you have to take a test to be on this blog, I’m outta here.

  12. El Gaucho

    That is an interesting point that Paul brings up at the end about historical fiction versus history and as a Historian it makes sense that his sensibilities (and gritted teeth) fall toward the latter. Of course it is a question of taste in reading, and style in reading I suppose. I rarely read anything non-fiction if I can help it, but I did recently read one of those Erik Larson books that are quite popular and enjoyed it a lot. He may not be very high-brow in History circles. But the larger question is: What is fiction? All non-fiction, even that which is scrupulously researched, is written with the perspective of the author. A good writer of historical fiction should be doing that same research, but perhaps write in such a way that more main-stream readers enjoy? With all of that said, one of the few other non-fiction history books I have read in recent years is the McCullough one on John Adams, and it was so good it might make my top-ten of best I’ve ever read, the other 9 being fiction, of course.

  13. That was a great book.
    AMDG

  14. El Gaucho

    Good literary fiction should of course represent humanity in an even “truer” way than non-fiction does. As the example of Skvorecky’s life experience which makes his fiction valuable for the reader; as Paul states.

  15. Louise

    “As a historian I am wary of fiction as a gateway to historical understanding (I grit my teeth when I see novels recommended to homeschoolers as part of their History curriculum)”
    I can understand this from the POV of a historian. But as a non-historian who certainly didn’t enjoy learning about history that much at school, I do enjoy historical novels and picking up at least some history with it. Also, after reading such a novel, I’m inclined to read a little more about the people or events of that time and place.

  16. The thing is that you frequently can’t trust historical fiction. If you know what really happened, or as close to it as you can figure out, the fiction can make it come alive, but you can get hold of a lot of bad stuff.
    I guess all that conversation about the latest Henry VIII miniseries is a case in point.
    AMDG

  17. My next authors post will be about this in a way.
    AMDG

  18. Janet, how did you know it was me before the name went up?
    I should perhaps clarify that I really like historical fiction, I’m just aware (perhaps hyper-aware) of its limitations as history. I really enjoy it, as fiction, when the historical part is not painfully inaccurate.

  19. The other day, Maclin said that you had sent him a post. I think I would have known anyway. This sentence for example: Had I anticipated this, I would not so lightly have lent out or given away the paperbacks I had bought. It’s just your turn of phrase.
    AMDG

  20. I was wondering whether the explanation was the “comment style” that somebody was discussing the other day, or something more direct.

  21. Well, I pretty much figure that most of us don’t know the difference between the Prague Spring and the Velvet Revolution.
    AMDG

  22. The one thing I find a little repetitive in Skvorecky’s work is that a lot of his characters, a lot of the time, are motivated by sexual attractions and desires (rather than by the desire to build a socialist future that they are supposed to be motivated by). There’s nothing obscene, but after a while it does become a little eye-rolling.

  23. And you have a son that’s young enough and old enough to be quizzed. That lets out everyone but Robert and you I think.
    AMDG

  24. El Gaucho

    It’s a shame that James Michener didn’t have time to get to Prague! 😀

  25. When you start your books with a history of the area from the time the first living cell appeared there, you don’t have time to write a lot of books.
    AMDG

  26. Totally off topic, and I feel a little selfish asking when there are so many worthier causes, but I was diagnosed with Bell’s palsy today and would appreciate prayers for a full recovery.

  27. On the bright side, I get to wear an eye-patch and look like a pirate.

  28. Will do.
    AMDG

  29. Marianne

    I’ve known two people who had Bell’s palsy and it’s a very scary thing when it happens, so don’t feel at all selfish asking for prayers. They recovered fully — will pray that you do, too.

  30. “most of us don’t know the difference between the Prague Spring and the Velvet Revolution.”
    [raises hand excitedly] I do! I do!
    Well, at least I think I do. I’ll check.

  31. Grumpy

    I can’t imagine not knowing that. It must have been much more real to Europeans than Americans.
    Paul I googled Bells Palsey and was relieved to see that it says it often lasts just a few weeks. I hope you make a swift recovery. I shall certainly pray for you on the way to Santiago.

  32. Yes, it is. Or maybe I’m just ignorant.
    Do you know about the Battle of Bull Run?
    I know YOU do, Maclin, you show off.
    AMDG

  33. Now I’m thinking that Grumpy lived in the US a lot and Paul just taught a class on Am. Lit., so they may make me look even more ignorant than before.
    AMDG

  34. Grumpy

    Not very much. I think Chief Sitting Bull was there, and Custer. Maybe Custer took his last stand there? I’m not sure.

  35. Oh good. That’s completely wrong. 😉
    AMDG

  36. Robert Gotcher

    Heck. I remember the Prague Spring and I was only nine years old. Huntley and Brinkley and all that.

  37. Grumpy

    Well, I freely admit it’s ignorant not to have heard of this Bull Run thing. It’s a piece of knowledge which someone who lives in America should have.
    But to me, anyhow, the Prague Spring and the Velvet Revolution are not pieces of knowledge. It’s not stuff one should know of. It’s things which we lived through. We lived through the Velvet revolution at the end of the 1980s. I was a child and Janet was a teenager during the Prague Spring, but everyone talked about it.

  38. Nobody around me talked about it.
    AMDG

  39. It’s probably because I was teenager during the Prague Spring–I was 17–that I don’t remember it. I was just not very interested in what was going on in the world at the time. What was going on in the South in 1968 was the Civil Rights Movement. That completely dominated the news as far as I can remember, and it affected our lives every day. It was around that time that Martin Luther King was assassinated 10 miles from my home.
    AMDG

  40. As for the Velvet Revolution, I remember the fall of the Berlin Wall very well, and that there had been other things happening in Eastern Europe before that, but not that name. It was the year I began homeschooling my three older kids. I had a two year old and I was working and completely overwhelmed. I couldn’t even deal with what was going on in my house.
    AMDG

  41. I wasn’t 100% sure that the term “Prague Spring” was attached to it, but I very much remember the 1968 events in Czechoslovokia. I was a bit older than you, though, Janet (still am, interestingly)–in college. Oddly, if you had mentioned the name Dubček instead of Prague Spring, I would have been 100% sure.
    I have a friend who used to say that the apocalypse actually happened in 1968. Maybe that’s when it officially began.

  42. And Paul, one of my children had Bell’s Palsy once. It went away as mysteriously as it appeared. I can’t remember how long it lasted but I don’t think it was more than a few months, maybe much less. Anyway, I’ll say a prayer for you.

  43. And Grumpy, Custer did fight at Bull Run, that just wasn’t his big doings.
    AMDG

  44. And that couple of years difference really makes a difference at that age. There’s a huge gulf between the last semester of high school and the end of your sophomore year of college.
    The other thing that I was involved in that year was Democratic politics–campaigning for McCarthy.
    AMDG

  45. And really y’all, I know I am still silly sometimes, but I don’t think you can comprehend the depth, height, and breadth of my complete ditzy-ness in my late teens and into my early 20s. It was only motherhood that turned me around a bit.
    AMDG

  46. Oh, and stupid me, Vietnam. In the spring of 1968, the brother of a girl in my class was killed in Vietnam. It shook me to my core. So, aside from race, that’s what people were talking about around me.
    AMDG

  47. Louise

    “The thing is that you frequently can’t trust historical fiction. If you know what really happened, or as close to it as you can figure out, the fiction can make it come alive, but you can get hold of a lot of bad stuff.”
    Yes, that’s very true.
    “Well, I pretty much figure that most of us don’t know the difference between the Prague Spring and the Velvet Revolution.”
    I certainly didn’t. Hangs head in shame
    “The one thing I find a little repetitive in Skvorecky’s work is that a lot of his characters, a lot of the time, are motivated by sexual attractions and desires (rather than by the desire to build a socialist future that they are supposed to be motivated by). There’s nothing obscene, but after a while it does become a little eye-rolling.”
    I can imagine. That kind of thing gets on my nerves after a while, unless it’s essential to the story.
    I’ll certainly pray for you, Paul. I hope you at least enjoy the eye patch. Arrrrr!

  48. Grumpy

    The velvet revolution was in 1989

  49. Marianne

    1968 was also the year Robert Kennedy was assassinated, just two months after Martin Luther King. So much going on in the U.S. at that time, it’s sort of a wonder we remember as much about the Prague Spring as we do.

  50. I know. That’s when I was first homeschooling and couldn’t look up from motherhood long enough to figure out what was going on in the world.
    The other stuff was the year of the Prague Spring.
    AMDG

  51. Speaking of historical fiction: historical movies and TV shows are probably worse. Well, maybe not worse, but at least as bad. I don’t know how many times I’ve heard someone say about something set in the past that “It really makes you see…” something or other about the way things were then, when it really did no such thing, and may well have been a consciously crafted piece of propaganda. I have no doubt there are people now going around talking about how Wolf Hall (novel or tv series) makes you see what Thomas More was really like.

  52. Bull Run was one of the chapters in a volume of Famous Battles I was given when I was 10 or 11. I don’t remember anything about it except that there was more than one and it’s a Civil War thing. And something about railways. Was it the first battle where soldiers arrived at the battlefield by train? (Which would explain it being in a volume otherwise dedicated to Europe and the British Empire. No, that’s not quite true either: Gettysburg and Little Big Horn were in there too.)
    There certainly are people going around talking about how Wolf Hall makes you see what Thomas More was really like. I even have students who can’t tell Thomas Cromwell and Thomas More apart (Which one was the Renaissance humanist? Which one was a martyr? Which was a ruthless careerist? Which of them had hundreds of people killed?)
    You get used to the idea that being a heresy hunter is a bit of a blot on More’s record, so even in my own case, as a student of the period, it brought me up short when Peter Marshall pointed out in a review of Wolf Hall that six people were executed as heretics while More was chancellor, and he personally condemned three of them. When you set that against the hundreds who died in the decade afterwards, as the Reformation was enforced, you wonder what it is about Cromwell that Hilary Mantel finds so much more attractive. I haven’t read the books or seen the TV show, but from all I’ve heard it’s hard not to think she’s just setting him up as an anti-More, irrespective of historical accuracy.

  53. Thanks for the prayers. I’m told that in 85%of cases the paralysis passes as suddenly as it came, leaving no lasting effects. I just don’t want to be in the 15%.

  54. Robert Gotcher

    I just listened last night to that version of Abraham, Martin, and John that has the audio snippets from the assassinations of the Kennedys and King. It is very intense. I can’t believe we listened to that on top 40 radio. 1968 was quite the year. Don’t forget Paris.

  55. Just a couple of years ago, I was driving home on a very busy street when that song came on the radio and I found myself sobbing. For me 1968 was the end of my youth in a way–at least that undaunted optimism of youth–and the beginning of a very dark period. However, eventually my old optimistic but cynical self re-emerged.
    AMDG

  56. The really great historical novelists are among the very greatest novelists (Scott, Manzoni, Undset, Tolstoy). But their works are still novels, not histories.
    As El Gaucho pointed out above, though, Skvorecky’s writing about 1968 is not historical fiction: it’s what he lived through, what he knows. It’s when he’s writing about Dvorak in New York, or the American Civil War, that he’s writing historical fiction.

  57. “For me 1968 was the end of my youth in a way–at least that undaunted optimism of youth–and the beginning of a very dark period.”
    I would not press the argument for it very hard, but I suspect–won’t quite say believe–that there is some sort of group psyche that passes through distinct phases of mood and energy. They’re too obscure and diffuse to map with any precision. But the period 1968-1970 certainly seemed to be some such thing. It was as if a wave crested and broke then. By 1971 things had changed in a very discernible way. Most notably to me, most of the energy of the leftist/hippie youth movement dissipated, seemingly almost overnight.

  58. “from all I’ve heard it’s hard not to think [Mantel]’s just setting [Crowell] up as an anti-More, irrespective of historical accuracy.”
    It was the late Christopher Hitchens who persuaded me that Mantel is not a writer I want to bother with. Reviewing Wolf Hall, he said more or less that, except of course that he considered Mantel to be correcting the record. I was not surprised that he was enthusiastically hostile to More. What did surprise me was that he seemed to admire Cromwell precisely as a “ruthless careerist”, a pure pragmatist, representing this as a happy step toward the Modern World.

  59. Mac, your comment before last prompts me to ask whether you’re still working on your memoir. I would like to read it.

  60. Grumpy

    I liked some of Mantels earlier books and found this development disappointing.

  61. Well, those three assasinations within 5 years and two very close together were horrible–Bobby Kennedy’s was crushing. And then if you were Catholic, it was worse, the Kennedys were Catholic and Pope John XXIII, who was a fountain of optimism, died that spring also.
    But yes, the music of that period makes it very obvious.
    AMDG

  62. Grumpy

    that’s beautiful Robert

  63. Louise

    “I even have students who can’t tell Thomas Cromwell and Thomas More apart (Which one was the Renaissance humanist? Which one was a martyr? Which was a ruthless careerist? Which of them had hundreds of people killed?)”
    Well, they were both called Thomas, so that’s gotta be confusing.

  64. True. Throw Thomas Cranmer in there and it’s an impossible tangle. 😉
    That is beautiful Robert.
    AMDG

  65. Yes, it is. I remember that, too. Somehow those last three words become very powerful.
    Paul, I can’t honestly say that I am working on the memoir, but I haven’t abandoned it. I expect to get going in earnest on it later this year, or at the latest the beginning of the next. If things go as planned, I’ll be fully retired from my job as of January 1, and will be able to put serious work into it. Glad to hear you’re interested.

  66. that’s good news, Mac — looking forward to it.

  67. I’m not a huge fan of historical novels but I’ve read a few. A couple good ones that come immediately to mind are Lampedusa’s The Leopard and Joseph Roth’s The Radetzky March.

  68. Marianne

    Gorgeous 1968 Christmas Eve video.
    It should have moved me to a moment or two of quiet awe, but I couldn’t help wondering if it would be possible for astronauts to read from Genesis today, assuming they’d even want to, of course. Well, I’d forgotten, or just never knew, that the atheist activist Madalyn Murray O’Hair actually brought a lawsuit against NASA over that reading. It was dismissed by a U.S. district court then, but today, who knows what would happen.

  69. Louise

    Yes, a lovely video.

  70. Grumpy

    Paul look at my fb for something relevant to your post!
    Heading for Europe today – send prayer requests to my Facebook messenger
    I hate saying goodbye to Stan! Going to pack the rucksack now, only he’s on my lap..

  71. happy and successful tramping, Grumpy.
    If you get up, he’ll probably go sit on the rucksack.

  72. Louise

    Have a blessed pilgrimage, Grumpy.

  73. The post that Grumpy refers to is George Weigel recommending Skvorecky’s Dvorak in Love as summer reading. Nice bit of synchronicity (is that the word I want?)
    Safe journey Grumpy!

  74. Pleasant journey, Grumpy!
    Prayers for you, Paul. If it’s any consolation, I have a friend who had it and recovered completely.

  75. Your comment, Rob, caused me to notice Marianne’s last one, which I had missed.
    Now that you mention it, Marianne, I think I vaguely remembered that O’Hair lawsuit. Or maybe I just remember that she was always doing stuff like that. What a very unpleasant person she was.

Leave a comment