I haven’t had time or mental space to write anything substantial this week. But here are a few interesting things I’ve run across.
-
At First Thoughts, the First Things blog, here’s one of those silly little games that book and music lovers like to play: If you had a shelf of books to help explain yourself, which two books would form the outer boundaries—the bookends—of you? I’m not sure I get this idea entirely. At first I drew a complete blank: “the outer boundaries of me”?—meaning…what exactly? But soon two books did present themselves to my mind: The Lord of the Rings and Four Quartets. I suppose they explain me in some way; at any rate they are the two books that I would least like to live without, which certainly says something about me.
Here are Sally Thomas’s thoughts on the question; though she doesn’t finally settle on only two books, her choices do overlap with mine significantly. What are yours?
-
Speaking of Four Quartets: I did, finally, finish Thomas Howard’s book about the Quartets, Dove Descending, and I really want to discuss it. Suffice for now to say that it vastly expanded my understanding of the poem and made me love it even more. In fact I might not have described it as “indispensable” before reading Howard.
-
Also at First Thoughts: liberal arts types really should not mess with stuff like quantum physics, because an actual physicist may come along and beat them up. This has been a temptation for some years now: a poet or philosopher or theologian or literary critic latches on to some highly simplified bit of esoteric physics and tries to appropriate it to support his views in his own field. It’s generally a big mistake.
-
In a comment thread, Janet linked to this profound meditation on marriage by Betty Duffy.
-
And my wife reminded me of this ancient truth: “Inside every old person is a young person wondering what the hell happened.”
Leave a reply to Janet Cancel reply