Mid-Week Miscellany

On the way to work a week or two ago I was passed by a Prius with a bumper sticker that said SIMPLIFY. It made me chuckle, because if there is one thing a Prius is not, it’s simple.  There’s a huge disconnect between the pastoral imagery of sophisticated advertising directing us to be more “green” and the sophisticated technology much of it is pushing. I don’t say the technology won’t deliver–maybe it will and maybe it won’t–but it is quite the opposite of a back-to-the-land impulse, in which very few people are seriously interested.

***

Perhaps you’ve heard about this disgusting bit of climate-change propaganda. Let me describe it before you click on that link, because it’s really a little disturbing: it portrays schoolchildren and others being given a pep talk about doing something to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, and then being asked whether they intend to participate. Those who say no are blown to bits, very graphically. It’s meant to be funny, but the almost universal reaction has been that it’s just repulsive and perhaps a bit scary. 

One thing about it that hasn’t been mentioned very often, though, is the assumption that the school has the right and probably the responsibility to preach environmental activism. I always knew that the expulsion of Christianity from American schools would not mean that there would be no moral teaching there, only that it would come from a different world-view.

***

I’ve often thought that the movie Bonnie and Clyde marked an important shift in our culture, a shift which was mainly for the worse.  Here is a leftist making my point for me, and more:

My theory is that Bonnie and Clyde was the most important text of the New Left, much more important than anything written by Paul Goodman or C. Wright Mills or Regis Debray. It made an argument about vitality and virtue vs. staidness and morality that was completely new, that resonated with young people in a way that made no sense to old people. Just the idea that the outlaws were the good guys and the bourgeois householders were the bad guys—you cannot underestimate [sic] how strange and fresh that was.

Of course sometimes the outlaws are the good guys, etc. But to erect that as a cultural dogma is sick. I remember how startling Bonnie and Clyde was–I was a college freshman at the time. You can expect a lot more on this topic in my memoir. 

***

Speaking of leftists, I am astonished to find myself in agreement with Katrina vanden Heuvul that we need to stop calling each other Nazis. It doesn’t seem like much to ask, but it probably won’t happen.

***

I think this was the funniest title for a blog post that I’ve run across in the past week or so: “They will know we are traddies by our love“. The target is radical traditionalist Catholics, and the author considers himself more or less one of them, but recognizes that they do often come across as hostile. Several commenters make the point that they have good reason to be hostile, and that’s true: one thing that really struck me as a new Catholic ca. 1980 was the contempt which was heaped on traditionalists by progressives (modernists, whatever you want to call them).


40 responses to “Mid-Week Miscellany”

  1. This go round, green is definitely more back to the cities than back to the land. (One really interesting piece in the ‘sustainability’ mix, I think, is the persistent interest — if only at the minority proportions that back-to-the-landers amounted to a generation or so ago — in bringing farming into cities. It popped up on Diane Rehm again this week, I believe.)
    What seems to me promising about the sometime green trend is the attempt in it to popularize ‘waste not, want not’ — once understood in the city & the country alike, but now, seemingly, somehow no longer legitimate principle among many of our self-identified conservatives.

  2. Janet Cupo

    There’s a politician running for office around here named Les Green. Definitely a name for another age.
    AMDG

  3. (Our ‘conservatives’ are generally for stopping waste in one sense, of course: government waste. But the spirit of the thing very widely seems to be that Government, reductively, is rival of People for the prize of prosperity — prosperity understood nearly as synonymous with self-aggrandizement. Government waste must be checked on principle of my liberty to become large and shiny, and sure, a little wasteful if it comes to it, why not, it’s America.)

  4. No, the old-time spirit of real thrift is not much to be found in conservative circles, generally speaking. I think people tend to see it as somehow incompatible with economic growth, but I doubt that it really is incompatible with healthy growth.

  5. I have slogan for your guy, Janet: Les is More Green.

  6. Janet Cupo

    🙂

  7. But then, NW rural Mississippi is not exactly what you would call PC.
    AMDG

  8. Yeah, Less Green might be better.

  9. That climate change agitprop sounded disgusting – I have cerainly not watched it. I appreciate the black humour (my humour is very black – hence the references to burning 95% of books – or heretics, for that matter). OTOH, I really wouldn’t put it past the Deep Ecologists to be looking at forcing their ideology onto others and by great violence – perhaps not right now, but down the track. They really don’t like humans and that’s pretty apparent.
    there’s a big push here in Oz for euthanasia… (again)

  10. I should add that I am a very great fan of Blackadder.

  11. This was perhaps my favourite scene:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkZFuKHXa7w

  12. I’m not surprised you’re a Blackadder fan, Louise. Not at all. 🙂 What I’ve seen of it seemed a mixed bag–some of it very funny, some a little over-the-black-humor-top, some just sort of mildly amusing. I’m afraid I didn’t actually laugh until the very last line of that clip. Have you seen Rowan Atkinson’s Johnny English espionage spoof? Some pretty funny moments in that (though offhand I can’t remember a single one…).
    I’m not sure how much can or should be read into that exploding-children ad, but it was certainly a gigantic mistake. It is very clear that a not-insignficant number of environmentalists are in a general sort of way anti-human. That people would put the two together ought to have been foreseen.

  13. What I keep trying to figure out is how is that different from Belloc’s Cautionary Tales or those dreadful events in the capital letters that Maclin links too sometimes. That it IS different in some way, I have no doubt, but I just can’t put my finger on what it is.
    And maybe it’s just because we know for sure that Belloc is tongue-in-cheek.
    AMDG

  14. “How that is …” not “How is that”

  15. Yeah, I’ve been having the same internal discussion. Perhaps the difference (do we really know Belloc didn’t mean it? 🙂 is that this is yoked to a specific and very real contemporary political issue, about which we know people have very strong feelings.

  16. He might have meant it, but we know that he had a Catholic ethic that forbid his carrying any dreadful deeds through–although I think in his poems the consequences followed from the acts. I guess we don’t really trust these folks not to follow through. If husband is playing with my grandkids and says he is going to eat them, I don’t worry. If a dragon says he is going to eat them, I worry.
    AMDG

  17. I came across this in a book today. I hadn’t heard of it before. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Struwwelpeter
    AMDG

  18. I’d heard of it, but not much more. I guess this sort of thing has a long history. There’s something of it in Alice In Wonderland, isn’t there? Or is that just my reaction–I know I always found the story somewhat creepy.

  19. My children love Struwwelpeter. Especially the oldest girl. Giggles and giggles.

  20. I think the problem with the environmental ad is that the message they want to convey is “If you don’t take action, you might as well just blow yourself up – it’s effectively what you’re doing in the long run, so get it over with.” But the message they actually convey is “We wish we could blow up these idiot children who don’t switch off lights when they leave a room.”
    And of course, feeding the children to lions would be far less offensive than making them explode.

  21. Janet Cupo

    I don’t like Alice in Wonderland, although there are snippets here and there that I like.
    Have you watched the ad, Paul? Because it looks much more like “Do what we say or die.”
    AMDG

  22. Yeah, it’s very definitely saying that: do what we say or die. It’s meant to be funny, but that’s what it says.

  23. I realised after posting it that it’s a subsequent scene that’s my favouite. And it’s really more to do with Percy’s delivery of his lines and Blackadder’s response, but the clip doesn’t seem to be up on youtube.

  24. re: the climate change video:
    “do what we say or die” would be hilariously funny to me (if it were adults exploding) except…
    I just don’t trust a set of people who are gung ho about abortion and euthanasia etc. These are people who are actually “happy” with the current deaths of innocent, by the million worldwide…
    that’s a far cry from Belloc
    Also, Belloc didn’t make videos…

  25. I love Belloc. I’m going to go out for coffee with him every week (unless Nick wants to come instead) now that DD is legally old enough to babysit. 🙂
    I might take St Chesty with me on alternate occasions…

  26. Janet Cupo

    There’s plenty of adults, too.
    AMDG

  27. Imagine a Catholic group organising the same video, only centred on orthodoxy/orthopraxy re: contraception!
    Can you imagine the uproar? and the fall-out?

  28. I’ve tried to come up with an analogy to suggest why people were appalled by that video, but haven’t come up with anything very good. The closest I can get is a group known to include racists making jokes about lynching. It’s not a very good analogy because it’s hard to even imagine a joke about lynching that wasn’t malicious. Part of it, though, is the sheer graphic violence of it. That would be somewhat repellent in just about any context.

  29. There’s a difference between “If you don’t do something about this, you’ll die” and “Do what we say or we’ll kill you”. I’m repeating myself, but just to clarify: I’m sure their intention was to convey the first, but they succeeded in conveying the second.

  30. Janet Cupo

    Well, you didn’t answer my question. Have you seen it? I don’t see how actively pushing a button to make people blow up can be construed as some passive sort of thing.
    AMDG

  31. Francesca

    I’m too squeamish to watch it, so I’ll take your words for it

  32. I think I found my analogy. I remember reading about a hit song–I think it was by the Dixie Chicks–about a woman killing her abusive husband. I had the impression it was treated in at least a partially humorous way, although I never heard it so I could be wrong. At any rate, a woman could produce a semi-serious song about killing her husband and not be condemned for it. A man producing a song about beating or killing his wife would at a minimum have to be really careful how he did it in order not to produce a justified revulsion in much of the public. (or just not care) The relationship to real violence would be too close, because it actually happens all too frequently that men do beat or kill their wives or girlfriends, whereas a woman who does that to a man is such a rare thing that it doesn’t seem like a real danger. Similarly, although violence by environmentalists is actually extremely rare, one does, as I said earlier, get a definite sense, sometimes quite explicitly stated, that a desire to get rid of a great many members of the human race is really present in environmentalism.
    And then, like Janet said, there’s the very cool and deliberate pressing of the destruct button. It’s not like the teacher is surprised or at all unhappy with the outcome.

  33. So of course immediately after posting the above comment I run across this news story:
    “[Investigators] were looking around, and they saw a freezer. They opened [it up], and there he was.”

  34. I’m not disagreeing with anybody about the impact of the ad (and I’ve seen enough of it – about half – to have a clear idea of what its impact is on me). I’m just saying that I don’t think that was its intended impact. I rather suspect the teacher is supposed to stand for “reality” or “the future” – not for “the environmentalists”. Whoever paid for the ad simply failed to twig to that besides lacking taste and giving offense, the natural reading put them in a directly unflattering light.

  35. Yeah, I’m certain you’re right that the makers of the thing didn’t intend the meaning that most people seem to have taken from it. The failure to “twig to that,” as you put it, is puzzling. My wife hadn’t heard of it, and when I described it to her, in as neutral a way as I could manage, and she was pretty shocked. I have to assume they didn’t do much audience testing outside their own circle.

  36. There have actually been questions in the Dutch parliament about it, so it’s been in the news here for a week or two.

  37. Well, the fact that so many mainstream environmentalists are happy to call people who doubt man-made climate change “denialists” makes me quite worried in itself.

  38. I don’t think that’s worked especially well for them as a PR technique. It pleases the committed, no doubt, but seems to be off-putting to others. Understandably.

  39. Francesca

    I first heard climate change sceptics called ‘Deniers’ on a Catholic blog (with a name like Vox Nova). I was so morally shocked I deleted the address in the bar thingy and never went back.

  40. Yeah, that’s exactly the kind of reaction that a lot of people have had to the term. It’s a tactical mistake on the part of the climate change activists, because it just pushes away the unpersuaded and causes the persuaded-in-the-other-direction folks to dig in their heels.
    I’ve read Vox Nova a few times and found it sort of a mixed bag, but in general not a blog I want to read regularly. Hmm, I just looked over there, and found this about that film. I didn’t notice Gillian Anderson in it. I must have been still in shock from seeing the children blown up.

Leave a reply to Mac Cancel reply