Cat People and Curse of the Cat People

I know this is not exactly appropriate for Wednesday of Holy Week, but I'm going to go ahead and write about these while they're still fresh on my mind, having watched the second of them last night. My wife and I watch a lot of movies together, but she's not necessarily interested in some of the same stuff I am, so I've been using Tuesday nights, when she's "attending" an online class, as a convenient time to watch some of those. 

Cat People is considered a "horror" classic of the '40s. I put that in quotes because there isn't any actual violence, blood, and gore in it–"supernatural suspense" would be a better description. I thought it might be fun in a campy or so-bad-it's-good sort of way, but it's considerably better than I expected. I wouldn't recommend it strongly unless you just like this sort of thing, but it does create an atmosphere very successfully, and the story has substance. It has an interesting philosophical dimension: the cat woman (of course it's a woman) is descended from Serbian witches who turn into panthers under the influence of strong emotion, especially negative emotion. She deeply wishes for this not to happen, but nobody takes her seriously, and she's treated as having a psychological problem. And her efforts to avoid the transformation have the unintended effect of helping to bring it on. The psychiatrist who attempts to treat her is a Man of Science who thinks he can explain everything in material terms, and I don't think I'll be giving away too much if I say that effort doesn't end well.

 So, that was last Tuesday. And I had no reason to think that the other movie on the DVD, Curse of the Cat People, would be anything but a silly sequel intended to capitalize on the success of the first (which was a huge hit, apparently) by repeating more or less the same story. So I intended to send the DVD back to Netflix without watching the second movie, but for some reason I kept thinking well, maybe I'll just check out the first ten minutes or so, and putting off sending it back, and pretty soon it was Tuesday night again and I decided to give it a try.

I'm really glad I did. This must be the most misleadingly named movie of all time. It has nothing to do with cat people per se, except that the character who was the cat woman in the first movie is involved, and it has nothing to do with a curse–if "cat people" had to be in the title, Blessing of the Cat People would have been more accurate. It is a sequel of sorts to the first movie, but is very, very different. It's not remotely a horror movie, even by 1940s standards, but rather, a sort of ghost story, a lovely and lyrical ghost story about a lonely little girl. It actually gave me more chills than Cat People, but those were produced by very skillful direction, not by anything sensationalistic. It's about loneliness and misunderstanding and love and redemption, and I do recommend it. My only reservation is that it ends a bit abruptly, not wrapping up a couple of things that I thought were important. (Well, and much of the acting in both is less than great, but it's ok.) You really would need to watch the first one first, though, as there are some things in the second that wouldn't entirely make sense without it.

 

21 responses to “Cat People and Curse of the Cat People

  1. My only reservation is that it ends a bit abruptly, not wrapping up a couple of things that I thought were important.
    No self-respecting cat would care what you thought was important.
    AMDG

  2. True, but there aren’t actually any cats in this one, except one sitting in a tree in the opening scene. I suppose the characters could be people cats, though, rather than cat people.

  3. Or maybe goat people.
    http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=32342337&l=2ba4a2a96b&id=1413619572
    Personally, I think he just wanted to eat the upholstery.
    AMDG

  4. I wonder if they punished the goat. It’s funny, till you start thinking about the implications of the fact that they really truly believe this, and are sometimes willing to kill people believed capable of doing it.

  5. Is the goat not in protective custody?

  6. Custody–yes. Protective–questionable, I expect.

  7. Francesca

    No self-respecting cat would care what you thought was important.
    That made me laugh.

  8. It was not quite as amusing to me as it might have been, because every time I sit down with my laptop on my lap I am quickly joined by a cat who will not be persuaded that her paws don’t belong on my keyboard. Eventually I lose my temper and dump her out of the chair, which I guess must feed some passive-aggressive thing she’s into…
    Great to see you again, Francesca!

  9. I thought of this tonight when we were saying the Divine Mercy Chaplet and Artemis was turning around in Bill’s lap, trying to find the best way to make herself comfortable while he held the book up out of her way. I have to admit that from my point of view it was quite amusing.
    Good to see you, Francesca!
    AMDG

  10. Francesca

    I say the office every evening with Pius and Stan competing for room on my lap, turning around, squeezing over each other, etc etc

  11. One sometimes wonders why one bothers. At least this one does. Although I wonder a lot more about the dogs, who are way more trouble.

  12. Can you imagine a movie called, Curse of the Dog People? Somehow, it just doesn’t work.
    AMDG

  13. And yet it’s actually more appropriate, because dog people are nuttier than cat people. Or maybe not, now that I think about it. Well, at least insofar as dogs tend to be more time-consuming and high-maintenance.

  14. Well, people who run around in circles sniffing each other and wagging their tales are certainly a curse, but not scary enough for a horror movie.

  15. Francesca

    I started thinking last night of a movie where people turn into dogs against their will. It would be extremely funny. It couldn’t be anything other than a comedy.

  16. True. I guess you could make a Cat People comedy, but you’d be sort of going against the natural drift of the idea.

  17. Wait a minute. Wasn’t there a Disney movie like that? But that was only one person.
    AMDG

  18. “like that” meaning dog or cat? If dog, yep, there was The Shaggy Dog, and it was only one person, and it was funny–how could one forget such a classic?!?

  19. I think that they remade it with Tim Allen, but I doubt it was very good. Fred MacMurray has just the right combination of dogginess and fatherliness to pull it off without looking like a jackass.
    AMDG

  20. The perfect Cat People video for Easter.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1qe2_cvDaU
    AMDG

  21. That’s great. The cat looks just like our cat Milo (except that something’s wrong with Milo–he’s all emaciated and missing a lot of fur).
    I just noticed your comment about The Shaggy Dog. I doubt very much that Hollywood could remake a movie like that without making it worse–throwing in a lot of crude humor, stupid stunts, etc.

Leave a reply to Mac Cancel reply