That seems to be the rationale for the media attention paid to the latest bit of very ordinary religious speculation on the part of Stephen Hawking. It's a tribute to the authority and prestige of science and scientists–much of it deserved–that a scientist's views on almost anything, no matter how far removed from his area of competence, are usually given more weight than those of a non-scientist. Hawking's opinion on this is no more or less valuable than a janitor's. Actually I would give it less weight than that of the janitor I know best, the woman who cleans the building where I work, because I know she has a fair amount of native wisdom, and I don't know that about Hawking.
For something in the science line that's far more interesting–being actually in the science line–see Craig Burrell's review of The 4% Universe, a book that sounds truly fascinating. Wish I had time to read it.
Leave a reply to Mac Cancel reply