Odds and Ends

Sunday Night Journal โ€” August 21, 2011

I've been so busy and pressured in my job, not only last week but through the weekend, that I'm really not equipped to write anything of substance on a specific topic tonight. Instead, I'm going to mention a few things that I had filed away with the intention of posting something about them.

***

I mentioned here some weeks ago that the traffic on this blog has declined over the past year or so. It never was very high–at most it averaged a bit over 100 unique visitors a day, and about twice that many page views. That is very small potatoes: really popular blogs count their page views in the thousands. And my numbers now are more like 80 and 160. If I subtract the number of accidental tourists–people who arrive here because they happened to be searching for Emmylou Harris or images of translucence–the number is even lower. It seems to be pretty typical that somewhere between twenty and thirty percent of visits to the site are from Google searches, and most of those are for something that's not closely connected with the main emphases of the blog, so I don't think those hits generate many continuing readers.

So when I read this post at Neo-Neocon a few weeks ago I was a little relieved to find out it isn't just me: it seems that fewer people are reading blogs in general. I'm pretty sure Facebook and Twitter are at least partly responsible for that.  

***

What's the most beautiful car ever made? I'm not a car fancier especially, and even if I could afford it I'm pretty sure I wouldn't want to buy anything very expensive. But I do have an eye for a good-looking automobile. When I was a teenager in the 1960s I thought the Jaguar XKE (picture lifted from here, if you're interested in buying it) was by far the most gorgeous:

Jaguar-XKE
 
I'm not sure I ever saw one on the hoof until many years later. I also thought the smaller Volvos (I think the model number is 1800, which shows you how little of a car buff I actually am) of the 1960s were extremely handsome, and later decided that I really thought them more beautiful than the XKE, which began to seem a bit flashy and overdone. I took these pictures a while back of one that was sitting outside a garage that I pass every day on my way home from work:

Volvo1

Volvo2

But of the cars I see on the road today, the last iteration of the Ford Thunderbird is the winner, and maybe the all-time winner. I suppose there must be some unbelievably expensive European cars that are more beautiful, but I've never seen those, even in pictures.

2002-2005_Ford_Thunderbird

There's something vaguely retro and classic about the style, though it doesn't look like any old car in particular, certainly not the old Thunderbird, so it doesn't seem like a self-conscious throwback (like the Chrysler PT Cruiser), and yet it's clearly different from the average contemporary car. Here is an interesting review of the T-bird's history. It seems emblematic of the progress of America in the last 50 years or so: an initial good idea, followed by a series of revisions which make it ever bigger and dumber, and finally an attempt to return to the vision of the past that fails: for as beautiful as the new Thunderbirds were, they apparently weren't very well made. Which was the point I intended to make when I saved that article in the first place.

***

The Atlantic has a story about the over-supply of virtuoso classical musicians. I've seen a little of this, having two children who would have liked to have made a career of music if there had been more jobs available. I was especially interested in that paragraph toward the end where the writer makes a similar point about the proliferation of writers. Anybody–look at me–can "publish" for next to nothing, or in fact nothing, if he uses one of the free blogging services. At the same time, the number of paying jobs that involve writing is in decline, as journalism struggles to find a place in the new electronic world (possibly a disaster in the making, because we need good journalists, but more of that another time). Similarly, digital recording technology has made it possible for anyone to make a decent-sounding recording with a couple of thousand dollars' worth of computers and software, or a professional-quality one for vastly less money than would have been required twenty or thirty years ago. The result is a flood of recorded music that mostly goes unnoticed. The piece concludes:

The big issue for education in the arts is not cutting enrollment to match supply, depriving gifted people of the chance to develop as far as possible. The challenge is to develop alternative career models that let people continue to develop their gifts.

I'm all for that but I can't imagine what it would be.

***

The state of Alabama recently passed a very aggressive law targeting illegal immigration, something like the one Arizona passed not long ago. Alabama has far less justification for something like this than does Arizona, where some reports I've read say that areas near the border are becoming dangerous for Americans. I assumed the law was in large part political grandstanding for the benefit of certain reflexively truculent descendants of the old Scotch-Irish, commonly known as rednecks. I also assumed that it didn't mean much, so when I read that some politically liberal religious groups were bringing suit against it, saying it would make simple charity toward illegal immigrants a crime, I supposed it was just their usual equally reflexive posturing.

But apparently I was mistaken. Sober people have read the law and concluded that it would indeed criminalize ordinary Christian ministry toward illegal immigrants. And the Archdiocese of Mobile has joined the lawsuit. 

Here is Archbishop Rodi's excellent statement. I agree with it, and I particularly like this:

The control and regulation of our national borders is the responsibility, first and foremost, of the federal government. An argument can be made that the federal government has not acted adequately to control and regulate our borders and to implement a just and workable immigration policy. Laws, such as this new one in our state, are born out of frustration with this governmental failure. However, the Church is not in charge of our borders. We do not determine who enters our country. But once immigrants are in our midst, the Church has a moral obligation, intrinsic to the living out of our faith, to be Christ-like to everyone.

If the federal government were doing its job, states wouldn't be passing laws like this. But be that as it may, this one ought to be repealed.

 ***

I'm sorry I haven't written any more about Tree of Life. I really wanted to, but it was crowded out by the same pressures that have produced this grab-bag post. I'm afraid now that much of it has slipped from my grasp. I'm really sorry I didn't go see it again–it was only going to show for one more night after I saw it, and I suppose now I won't have another chance until the DVD is available. I'll say one thing: the opening quotation, from Job–"Where were you when I laid the foundations of the world?"–and the mother's words near the end–"I give you my son"–seem to me to define the vision.

27 responses to “Odds and Ends”

  1. This brief review of The Tree of Life sums things up quite well, I think:
    http://merecomments.typepad.com/merecomments/2011/08/looking-up-the-tree-of-life.html

  2. Yes, that is good, and your comment there is even better. Are MC comments moderated? I made one (nothing much), or thought I did, but it isn’t appearing now.

  3. I don’t think they’re moderated, although objectionable comments are sometimes deleted after the fact. I’d try again — don’t forget the password thingy at the end. Sometimes I miss that and then the comment doesn’t post.

  4. resident film & theology expert

    In a way, FB gives everyone their own ‘blog’ stream. If you have a few entertaining friends, your need to surf is proportionately reduced.

  5. Yeah, that’s definitely part of it. It substitutes, and more, for the social aspect of blogging. I don’t actually use it that much–I check in once a day or so, but I find it too distracting to leave it open all the time, the way a lot of people seem to.

  6. I find it too boring to leave it open all the time. I rarely read anything of any length that anyone links to on Facebook. Mostly, I post pictures of my grandchildren.
    AMDG

  7. Well, now that I’ve said I don’t leave Fb on, I’m sitting here watching a conversation between my friends who live around the earthquake.
    AMDG

  8. Hmm, didn’t know there was an earthquake…5.9, fairly significant.

  9. resident film & theology expert

    exactly. someone I know in DC posted that an earthquake had hit his house within 8 minutes of the event.

  10. We felt it here in Pittsburgh too — it was a little freaky. It was like someone heavy walked by in the aisle behind me, but it continued for a few seconds. Then I realized that everyone else had felt it too. Very strange.

  11. I’ve never experienced one. I can imagine that a big one would be quite disturbing. One of my children is in DC. I haven’t looked in on Facebook today but I expect he’s had something to say.

  12. Living on the New Madrid fault, all my life I have heard that sometime in the next 10 years, we are going to have “the big one.” Several decades ago, I used to worry about it, and it might come any time, but they’ve been wrong 6 times in my life so far. The last big quake was in 1865, although there are small ones every few years. They are really strange because you can feel one when a person across the room doesn’t. Once when I was a teenager, one almost shook me out of bed upstairs and my mother downstairs didn’t feel anything. None of them were very strong.
    In 1990, a guy named Iben Browning predicted that in early December we would have an earthquake between 6.5 and 7.5. No other scientists agreed, but I can remember driving over an expressway on December first and seeing traffic pouring out of the city.
    AMDG
    AMDG

  13. A young fellow I know has been in the States as a summer camp supervisor (?) and was on a bus when the earthquake hit, but reckons he didn’t notice b/c the bus had good suspension! (Must’ve been really good suspension!)
    via FB

  14. I gave up blogging and reading blogs for other reasons, and I’ve just never really got back to it much. This is one of the few I read regularly.

  15. Please pray for me y’all. I’ve just realised it’s been about a year since I s started having a really hard time and I’m not sure when or even if it’ll let up. It’s not to do with me directly but stuff going on around me which in some respects seems not to be improving and it’s affecting my ability to stay on top of just the basics.

  16. Will do.
    AMDG

  17. I will certainly do that, Louise. I know it’s tough raising a big family–whether or not that’s directly part of the difficulty, it’s just…tough.
    Raising a small family is tough, too.
    Ok, life is just tough, period. Though some lives and some times are tougher than others.

  18. Anne-Marie

    Will do, Louise.
    I read blogs, and comment on them, less than I used to, partly because I am trying to be more responsible about attending to my duties in the actual world around me, partly because their attraction has in many cases lessened (many of them bloggers I was reading have run out of interesting things to say), and partly because I stopped caring about making sure that the virtual world got every possible chance to share My Deep Insights.
    That was my first earthquake!

  19. I read less, and comment much less. So I shouldn’t complain.
    I’m also much less subject to this syndrome.
    Ca. 1995, a co-worker and I wondered if the web would be the CB radio of the ’90s. I guess not.
    Janet, I never thought about you being on that fault. Was the 1865 one the one that changed the course of the Mississippi etc.? As we all know similar predictions have been made about California for a long time, too. And I guess if either of those ever happens everybody will say “why didn’t they listen to the warnings?” But what are we going to do, depopulate huge areas because something bad might happen in the next 100 years or so?

  20. resident film & theology expert

    I can remember having that syndrome. I can remember being 15 minutes late for class on one occasion because I was arguing with someone on the internet. That was at least ten years ago – on those old fashioned ‘list serve’ things on email. Then there was blogs and arguing with people on blogs. There were some very enjoyable things – Amy Welborne at her peak and Al Kimel at his. I haven’t argued with anyone on a blog for – don’t know, maybe three years? It was great fun while it lasted. But that era has come and gone. Someone who had been and gone on that email list said to me a few years back that you end up having long arguments with someone you would not have in your living room. That’s true, but it’s not the whole story. I don’t even want to argue in a com box any more with someone I would have in my living room!

  21. Several years ago, I was on a Walker Percy listserve, a C.S. Lewis yahoo group and some other group. All three where having the exact same Catholic/Protestant argument. They were virtually indistinguishable from each other. I had already quit arguing and that was when I quit reading. I can’t imagine any of those arguments doing any good.
    At this point I read the blogs of 3 friends and sometimes Mere Comments.
    AMDG

  22. What I really notice in myself is a greatly increased willingness to just drop a discussion and walk away when I see it’s hopeless. In the past it bothered me a lot more to let an obvious non sequitur or straw man stand. I would have to at least refudiate that. And then of course it would lead to something else. Now I don’t care, or not nearly as much. If you can see that there’s never going to be an agreement, and the general tenor of the discussion is such that you’re not even going to arrive at a “yes, I see the merits of your view, though I still disagree”, why waste more time and energy?

  23. Anne-Marie

    Exacty, Mac. Plus, I used to believe that the people who ranted in comboxes just needed to have some facts and explanations made to them in a calm, dispassionate way and they would in turn calm down.

  24. Frequently it only makes them madder–the longer you fail to agree with them, the more culpable your disagreement appears.

  25. Thankyou, everyone.

  26. resident film & theology expert

    Rod Dreher’s Crunchy Con was a great blog with some really good comboxers. In the glory days, a blog was as good as the comboxers it could attract. Yes, arguing in a combox is a waste of time, because it’s a fast medium and thought is slow. But for the observers of some of thedebates, it was enjoyable and sometimes educational.

  27. RFTE’s comment: “like”

Leave a reply to Mac Cancel reply