The Netflix War on Me

It seems to be a popular rhetorical device these days to describe any opposition to something you favor as a declaration of war against it. The first time I remember hearing it was some twenty years ago, during one of the periodic battles over the National Endowment for the Arts, in which conservatives object to federal funding of offensive art (or, in some cases, "art"): Andrei Codrescu was on NPR denouncing "the Republican war on art" (or should that be "Art"?). And currently, in a slight variation of the theme, if you believe the rich should be taxed more heavily, some will say that you are engaging in class warfare. Others say that if you believe the rich should not be taxed more heavily, you are engaging in class warfare.

So, in the spirit of the times, I wish to denounce the Netflix war on me–specifically, on my ability to have affordable access to a vast library of movies. As you may have heard, Netflix is about to split into two businesses, one of which will retain the name and will only provide "content" streamed over the Internet. The other will continue the DVD rental business and will be called…it's hard for me even to type this…Qwikster. It is being said by the business-savvy that the company wants to get out of the DVD business because streaming is the future, and that it will either sell or slowly kill the DVD business. And I must say that if I planned to destroy a company I would certainly want to give it a meaningless, yet somehow stupid-sounding, name like…Qwikster. I may end my account just to avoid seeing that name–or, God forbid, finding myself in the position of needing to say it.

Really, this is depressing news. For several years my wife and I have had a Netflix account that allowed us to keep either two or three DVDs at a time, and for the first couple of those years gorged ourselves on a lot of the movies we'd always wanted to see but were too obscure to be available as rentals in local video stores, but too expensive to buy (and anyway there aren't that many movies I want to see more than once). For the past year we've cut way back, because we've been too busy, but we are still steady customers. There are probably close to a hundred titles in our queue. 

As it turns out, according to some comments I've seen, we are exactly the kind of customers Netflix wants to get rid off. The DVD-by-mail business is one of those where the idea is to sell people something they don't use: every DVD that Netflix mails to us reduces the money they get to keep from our monthly fee. They want people who will sign up, get a movie, let it sit around the house unwatched for a week, watch it, and let it sit around the house for another week before remembering to send it back. They don't want people like me who, having watched a movie, immediately take the DVD out of the player and put it back in the envelope, seal it up, and set it somewhere near the front door so they won't forget to put it in the mail the next morning.

I'm sure the rental business won't disappear overnight, and in theory a streaming library containing everything currently available on DVD would be just as good. But I have a feeling it won't work out that way.  More likely it would become the Internet version of cable TV, offering a vast amount of garbage, and making it impossible to get the little bit of good stuff without also paying for the garbage. Business Week already predicts the rental business will be sold. And Megan McArdle of The Atlantic thinks both companies are doomed. It's striking, and rather dismaying, how convoluted the business and technical aspects of these enterprises can become.


19 responses to “The Netflix War on Me”

  1. It was such a good idea, too. Didn’t you love the affecting little letter from the CEO or whoever he was?
    They used to have a place on the website where they sold excess DVDs, and I was thinking this might be a good time to see what they had, but the page seems to be gone.
    AMDG

  2. I haven’t seen the letter–it probably went to an old email account of my wife’s since the Nf account is in her name. I never noticed that about the sale of the used DVDs. Too bad.

  3. Just a taste:
    Dear Janet,
    I messed up. I owe you an explanation.
    It is clear from the feedback over the past two months that many members felt we lacked respect and humility in the way we announced the separation of DVD and streaming and the price changes. That was certainly not our intent, and I offer my sincere apology. Let me explain what we are doing.

    AMDG

  4. So touching. It made me shed tears.
    AMDG

  5. I’ve been spending too much time on Facebook. I got to the end of Janet’s last comment and started looking for the “like’ button.

  6. That letter is being denounced and mocked all over the net. If you look at any tech or business-related site, you’ll see a lot of “what were they thinking?” comments.
    Is “Qw” even officially pronounceable in English? why not “Kwik” or “Quik”? if you couldn’t bring yourself to use “Quick”. And the “-ster” part–so 1999.:-) For me the immediate assocation is another debacle, Napster.

  7. Never got the “letter.” I guess I’ll have to stick with the DVD service until I have to switch, although that irks the hell out of me.
    I’m currently reading Neil Postman’s “Technopoly,” and I’m really finding it disturbing how tech-dependent I am, even though I consider myself a bit of a Luddite. I recently read an essay by Wendell Berry in which he described our economy as not only consumption-dependent but sucker-dependent, in that we tend to be suckers for anything new that comes down the pike. So why do we “need” streaming? Or is this just another gizmo for suckers?

  8. I pretty much gave up on the anti-technology battle. I realized a long time ago that I was never going to do anything concrete like going off and buying a farm, and am willing to leave it to people like Postman and Berry to do the critique. I generally agree with them in principle, but…almost nobody is ever going to voluntarily relinquish the technology he especially likes, or that makes his life much more comfortable. People lived in the South for a long time without air conditioning, and may be forced to do so again, but it takes almost heroic virtue to voluntarily do without it if you could have it. It will take some sort of major collapse of our way of life to force most people to give up major technology.
    Streaming video, now–that’s a good candidate for discarding, because I personally am not especially interested in it. ๐Ÿ™‚ If you read the comments on that Megan McArdle piece I linked to, you’ll find a lot of people saying they think it’s great. I guess it’s the ability to get it at the moment you want it, and not have to bother with thinking ahead, and mailing things. Although anyone who finds putting a dvd in an envelope and putting the envelope in a mailbox very burdensome needs to makes some adjustments in his idea of what’s burdensome.

  9. “I generally agree with them in principle, but…almost nobody is ever going to voluntarily relinquish the technology he especially likes, or that makes his life much more comfortable.”
    True. I guess the way I look at it is that I am where I am, but at least I can attempt to limit any future complicity. I put off getting a cell phone for a long time, and I still don’t have an IPod. I’ve trained myself to be skeptical of anything new that seems to be a sop to mere convenience, because I think that’s where the suckerism comes in.

  10. I’ve been spending too much time on Facebook. I got to the end of Janet’s last comment and started looking for the “like’ button.
    “Like”
    (or, in Pirate English, Arrrr!)

  11. One can, btw, ‘like’ posts. Presumably you have to be logged in to Fb to do that, though. Just thought I’d mention it. ๐Ÿ™‚
    Hmm, there’s a feature called “Facebook comment syncing” which I have turned off–I’ll have to see what exactly that does.

  12. Maybe if you link the post to Facebook, it puts comments made on the blog on Facebook, too.
    AMDG

  13. My wife coaxed me into getting a cell phone some time ago when I was going on a long trip by myself. It’s handy sometimes but I could easily live without it. However, being a techie by trade, I keep thinking I ought to get an iPhone or similar “smart” phone, just to know what’s going on. I will soon be supporting a software application for phones/tablets. But if it’s required for my job my employer ought to pay for it. All my children have them and I have to admit they are pretty neat. Oh wait, I forgot, one of them doesn’t anymore–his iPhone broke and rather than buy another one he just bought a cheap un-smart phone, and said he felt somewhat liberated, which I thought was interesting.
    I have an iPod which wife and children (actually I think it was just one child) bought me as a present probably 5 years ago. At the time I had no cd player in my car, so I really enjoyed it for that. Don’t use it as much now though I do like it. I’ve tried using it as an incentive for exercising, but I find that it gets in the way.
    There are some “conveniences” that I’m actively hostile to. I’m still somewhat that way about mobile phones, actually. I don’t like radio-controlled car doors.

  14. I have occasionally linked posts to Facebook–there’s a flag I can set that causes the post to appear as an update from me on Fb. I don’t think the comments appeared there, though. Maybe if I do that and set this comment-sync thing… Not sure it’s worth the trouble, as I’ve never been able to tell from my stats that more than one or two people ever actually came from Fb to read one of those posts.

  15. Well, maybe if they had seen our brilliant comments …
    AMDG

  16. Excellent point.

  17. Well, I saw the latest post linked from Facebook, but didn’t actually follow that link to get here (partly because it’s one click instead of two to come directly rather than through the Facebook feed; partly because I don’t like letting on to Facebook just which links interest me โ€” although I seem to be happy enough for them to know my date of birth and place of employment …)
    Perhaps the Facebook synch would put comments from Facebook on the blog, rather than (or as well as) vice versa?

  18. I was going to try this out with that post, but it proved to be more complicated to set up than I expected, involving changes to various Facebook settings, and I didn’t have time to fool with it. But it looks like I would have to set it to automatically post every blog post to Facebook, and I don’t necessarily want to do that. Maybe I’ll play around with it this weekend. Since I have so much leisure…

  19. Here’s somebody’s list of Netflix alternatives. None of them sounds anything like the Netflix we love, with the possible exception of Blockbuster. If all I wanted was the current hit movies I never would have subscribed to Nf in the first place.

Leave a reply to Rob G Cancel reply