ABO…

…stands for Anybody But Obama. I haven't said much (have I said anything?) about the election. But I posted a comment at Neo-neocon earlier, and since I spent more time than I had intended on it, and it's a pretty good summary of my view of President Obama and the election, I think I'll reproduce it here. The topic of the post (read it here) is why some people still find Obama likeable, and why they ever did in the first place. A number of people commenting there dislike him very intensely, to say the least. Here's what I said:

Well, this is interesting. Another data point: I was inclined to like Obama when I first heard him speak, sometime in the year or so before the 2008 campaign was in full swing. I thought well, maybe he actually is the sort of person who could bring us together instead of dividing us, who could appeal to what’s best on both sides of our divisions, etc.

That didn’t last long, but I still hoped he would beat Hillary for the nomination–because I have the visceral dislike for the Clintons that many of you seem to have for Obama. (I thought I was over that, but every time I hear Bill’s voice it comes back.) Even after he won the election, I was prepared to give him the benefit of the doubt, and hoped that he would be a decent president. And, yeah, I admit to a sentimental warmth about the election of our first “black” (i.e. visibly mixed-race) president.

Pretty soon, of course, I realized how bad he was going to be, and that his idea of conciliation was that everybody would do what he told them to. So I lost any good feeling toward him that I’d had.

But I still have not developed that strong personal dislike. I’ve been in the Oval Office with him, shaken his hand, looked into his eyes, said a few words to him (“God bless you”). (No, I’m not anybody important, it was a ceremonial occasion.) I didn’t have any gut-level sense of “this is a bad guy” or even “this is a phony.” I just think he’s a man with very bad ideas and a very bad agenda upon which he is very determined, and I want to see him gone. It’s not personal.

I read a comment once from some Bush administration official that many people had the idea that Bush was dumb, but a nice guy, and that both were false. Substitute “smart” for “dumb” in that sentence, and I think it’s pretty true of Obama.

I was pretty sure from the beginning that Obamacare was going to be used as a tool by social progressives to impose their will on retrograde elements, and I was certainly right about that. The attack on religious freedom was the last straw, a matter so fundamental that it makes all other issues seem less important, the political equivalent of an enemy invasion, the point at which negotiation is no longer an option and you have to either fight or accept the invader's rule. At this point I would vote for an empty beer can over Obama and his zany sidekick.

17 responses to “ABO…”

  1. I’m curious as to what other people think about Obama. Aside from whether you agree or disagree with him politically, do you think he’s a nice guy? Can’t completely separate the personal and the political here, of course, but it does seem that a lot of people either drool over him or can’t stand the sight or sound of him.

  2. Grumphy

    I would prefer if Romney wins because of the health care issue (don’t want to see President Jenkins go to prison), but otherwise I am indifferent to Obama. Like you I was glad a black guy won.

  3. Marianne

    I don’t see him as a nice guy. I came to this feeling early while watching part of one of the debates before the Democratic primaries in 2008. It was the moment when he said something about Hillary Clinton being likeable enough. Now, I’m not a Hillary fan at all, but it was a very nasty comment, and it gave us a peek at the real man. Then there was all the self-aggrandizing stuff with the Roman columns, lowering the ocean levels, etc. Pretty demagogic stuff, and not nice.

  4. My progression was similar. I definitely don’t think (anymore) that he’s a nice guy. But I don’t have that intense dislike (to put it mildly) that a lot of people on the right seem to. E.g. some of the comments on that neo-neocon post.

  5. I don’t think I ever liked him, because since we don’t have TV reception, one of the first times I saw him speak was on that Planned Parenthood YouTube where he was so determinedly pro-abortion–not just pro-choice, but really pro-abortion.
    I like him less now. I think he is arrogant and seems to think that he is above the law. I have no idea whether he is stupid or smart, but he seems to be rather ignorant. And I think that he will be relentless against the Church.
    AMDG
    AMDG

  6. Grumphy

    I did snicker when I read the comment last weekend that the point of Joe Biden is to make Obama look like a statesman. But not because of anything about Obama, really, but because Biden seems such a nowhere guy.

  7. He’s one of those liberals who has a sort of culturally smart quality–the right opinions, the right manner–without being all that smart himself. And definitely arrogant. And I think you’re right about him vs. the Church.

  8. I’m not the most avid newshound in the world, and when I first heard that bit about the sea levels receding I thought it was conservative satire. That was sort of mind-boggling.

  9. Grumphy, for what it’s worth I’ve heard serious commentators make the argument that Obama won’t dump Biden for just that reason. Somebody like Hillary might make him look bad.

  10. I wonder, Grumphy, if you have a milder reaction to the contraception mandate than a lot of us native Americans (:-)) do because you don’t have the sense of the Constitution, and especially the Bill of Rights, as having sort of quasi-scriptural authority, as far as the governing of the country is concerned. This is a direct attack on the “free exercise of religion” clause. I wish I felt confident that the Supreme Court would rule against it.

  11. Grumphy

    Yeah, it’s definitely because I’m English. I know passively that there is a Bill of Rights and it has something about ‘free exercise of religion’ in it, but it is not in the active part of my brain. When I came here I had all kinds of high minded intentions about reading baby books just to find out how the senate and congress work. But I’ve been over my head in writing lectures for the past 18 months, and this semester looks set to being the worst yet. Not ‘worst’ in an horrible sense, just in the sense that I don’t read a book outside what I need to read for tomorrow’s class.
    I thought of adding something like, in all the British universities I have worked in the past 23 years, you could buy condoms from a dispenser in the lady’s lav. So I find it difficult to see this as Satanic. Yes I know it is entirely different 🙂
    I am not entirely apathetic, I should say. I have joined ‘Faculty for Life’, which is like Screwtape’s intended victim the first time he goes to church – he sees all the people he’s been avoiding the past 20 years. But no, you are right, there is no fire in my belly, because it’s not a law I believe is sacred – it’s not habeas corpus or Magna Carta. It’s a law of whose existence you just reminded me.

  12. “not habeas corpus or Magna Carta”
    Good comparison, because that’s exactly what it is to us. More, in a way, because it defines the whole system of government, the whole relationship of government to people.
    Re how the senate works etc.: if it’s any consolation, I don’t have more than a half-baked idea of any of that stuff, nor do most Americans. Actually at this point in the decline of education and civic sense, having a half-baked idea probably puts me in the top 20% or so of experts. There was a video making the rounds a few months ago in which a teacher repeatedly declared to a student that he could be arrested for “disrespecting” the president.

  13. I do not find Obama or his wife particularly appealing.
    He was never suitable for the position due to lack of preparation and has reacted to our very real fiscal problems by pretending it is not happening.

  14. Grumphy

    Hello Arty, I always like the way you express yourself.

  15. Regarding Obama’s suitability: a lot of people, not “birthers,” have observed that he really doesn’t seem to understand or love American all that much, and I think there’s something to that. The “bitter clingers” remarks, which he never intended to be heard outside the little group of fundraisers where he made it, were evidence of that.

  16. Grumphy

    He is like most theology professors I know, in all of his opinions that I am aware of, and in his way of expressing them. Those are the attitudes of a mainstream Protestant theology professor. I have spent most of my life among them. I have a higher toleration for this group than those who have not done so might do.

  17. They’re the attitudes of a mainstream academic in general, especially one in the liberal arts or social sciences. I’ve often said that in a lot of ways he’s just your basic white liberal. It’s not that I have animosity toward people like that, I just don’t want one of them to be president.
    I guess it was obvious that I meant “America” for “American” above.

Leave a reply to Mac Cancel reply