Three More Movies

I'm beginning to run out of steam on this effort to watch as many as possible of the movies saved on our DVR before it goes back to AT&T. I told my wife the other day that we are at risk of becoming couch potatoes. But here are three from the past three weeks or so that are worth mentioning.

All About Eve (1950)

I knew that this was a famous movie, but other than that I didn't know anything at all about it. I was expecting some sort of romantic comedy thing–mysterious and capricious Eve, steady and befuddled Adam, maybe, or something along those lines. Well, it's not that at all. It's a study of female competition, of a young woman's attempt to push aside an older one. Bette Davis plays Margot Channing, an aging actress. Anne Baxter plays the Eve of the title, who first appears as Margot's star-struck worshipper, then gradually shows her true and predatory colors.

I can't say it offers any profound insights, although it probably gets studied, and maybe condemned, in feminist circles. But for the rest of us, it's just a very well-crafted piece of drama, with a witty and literate script and really good acting. I don't think it will give away too much if you watch this clip, a bit which occurs when Margot is beginning to figure out what Eve is up to. Marilyn Monroe has a small but memorable part. A bit after this scene she has one of the funniest lines in the movie.

 

Grand Illusion (1937)

Well, this is a classic, as you probably know, and therefore something anybody with a more than casual interest in cinema should see. But I don't mean to sound as if I'm telling you to eat your vegetables; you'll enjoy it. I had seen it once years before, and although I'd forgotten all the details, I did remember being touched by its picture of a privileged order with a genuine tradition of high honor being swept away by the modern world. But it's more than that; I mean, it's not a sociological study. And it's even better than I remembered. While looking for a suitable clip on YouTube, I ran across this 4-minute video review by a New York Times critic, which is pretty much on target (even though, this being the NYT, it dwells on a bit of cross-dressing which is really not important to the plot).

 

Wings of Desire (1987)

I guess most people who would be interested in this have seen it and know whether they like it or not.  But in case you don't: it's by the German director Wim Wenders and is about an angel who wants to become human, who's attracted by material reality in general and especially, of course, to women. Not surprisingly, the theology of that is pretty messed up, as is indicated by the fact that the first part is in black and white, and color only begins to appear when the angel contemplates the beautiful trapeze artist he's falling in love with. But that whole first half or so, which for a substantial length of time consists only of this angel and a companion (associate?) moving about the world, describing it to each other, touching people gently, is one of the most beautiful bits of cinema I've ever seen. I'd be happy to watch it again right now. I had seen this one, too, closer to fifteen than to thirty years ago, as with Grand Illusion, and had similarly forgotten most of it.

Here's a clip that will give you the flavor of that opening section, if you haven't seen it. The man with the scarf, the first face you see in the clip, is the angel. The voices are the thoughts of the people he sees. He is invisible to them. Oh wait, embedding is disabled for this clip, so follow this link.

Wings of Desire is the English-language title. The director's title is Der Himmel über Berlin, or The Heavens over Berlin.


10 responses to “Three More Movies”

  1. Wings of Desire is an all time favourite of mine. I have shown it in many classes. Wenders later became a Christian – a Presbyterian. He was actually brought up RC, in Germany, and said he couldn’t face returning to German Catholicism. That was in an interview in Image from about 10 years ago. So I don’t know what happened – he would still be Presbyterian, or have left the Presbyterians and became pagan again, or become Catholic after all.

  2. Well, that’s very interesting. As is the fact that there is a sequel to Wings, which I just learned today. Have you seen it? It’s called “Close but So Far” or something like that.

  3. “Far Away, So Close”

  4. No. Did you know there is a Hollywood version? I tried that out one time on my students without pre-viewing it. It’s dreadful beyond words.

  5. It was mentioned in the Wikipedia article on Wings, which was where I learned of the sequel. Figuring I would probably never watch the Hollywood one, I started reading its synopsis. That was enough for me to think it would be dreadful.

  6. Saw ‘Inside Llewyn Davis’ again night before last. While it was definitely the music that drew me back to see it again I must say that it worked much better as a film for me the second time around. Upon reflection, I’d say it’s the Coens’ best work since ‘O Brother,’ excepting ‘No Country…’

  7. That definitely puts it in the worth-seeing class.

  8. Can’t remember which thread Magnolia was discussed on, but I watched it last night. On the whole I liked it, although I felt that its power was somewhat diffused by its length. Tom Cruise and the girl who played the coke addict were great, and the characters played by John C. Reilly and P.S. Hoffman were good, noble men portrayed without the standard ironic wink.
    On the negative side the rest of the characters were largely unlikeable, and Julianne Moore was occasionally way OTT in her role as the prescription-drug addicted wife. I did like the forgiveness theme that ran through the film, however.
    I noticed that the scores for Magnolia and Crash are roughly in the same ballpark (77 vs. 69) on Metacritic. I’d give the edge to the former in terms of sheer creativity and audaciousness, but I like the latter a lot better as a cohesive film, even if it does have its preachy moments. I don’t think those moments sink Crash any more than the “bizarre” moments in it sink Magnolia.

  9. I’ll give Crash a try sometime.
    I wasn’t bothered by the length of Magnolia–I never found it dull or started thinking I was ready for it to be over. I liked the coke addict girl, too; I think that was my favorite performance. I had never heard of the actress before: her name is Melora Walters. The drugged-up wife was certainly OTT, and I found myself thinking that and wondering if it was simply a realistic portrayal–never been around anybody like that, but I’ve never been around rich show-bizzy Californians, either.

  10. Yes, the length didn’t really bother me either. I just think it might have been tighter and more cohesive had it been shorter. There were certain times when it felt maybe like it was just stretched a little thin.

Leave a reply to Rob G Cancel reply