Nobody Wants to Hear the State of the Union Speech

Except diehard loyalists of the incumbent party. Nor should they, it seems. I suppose most of us, or at least those of us who aspire to be Informed Citizens, think of it as something we should pay attention to, but really have no interest in, and will be entirely unaffected by, except for a certain amount of vexation proportional to our dislike of the current chief executive.

Well, we shouldn't feel guilty about it, says Charles Cooke of National Review: yes, it's in the Constitution, but its current use as a platform for grandstanding by the president is a distortion of its intent. Cooke is one of those British immigrants who are more in sympathy with American ideals than most Americans are.

That the practice that Jefferson strangled was eventually resuscitated by that outspoken enemy of republican virtue, President Thomas Woodrow Wilson, should frankly worry anybody who is concerned about the maintenance of political balance in America. Champions of the legislature might be alarmed, too, to learn that, after the infinitely laudable Calvin Coolidge had reversed Wilson’s course, the spoken address was brought back once again by the most imperial of all America’s imperial presidents, Franklin Delano Roosevelt. 

 Ignore it with a clear conscience.


,

16 responses to “Nobody Wants to Hear the State of the Union Speech”

  1. I always do, no matter who’s giving it, and I have for years, purposely.

  2. Is it tonight?
    AMDG

  3. Yes. Probably happening right now.

  4. A member of my household elected to view it, so I was treated to it. I have to say the man makes a repulsive speaker.
    The reply by that Senator from Iowa was embarrassing: unnecessarily self-referential and garnished with gratuitous gushing. She presents herself as if she were a bloody mannequin as well. Shields and Brooks thought it satisfactory. Go figure.

  5. I saw this comment first in the main page that I get when I log in to my Typepad account, where it shows the first so many characters of recent comments. This one ended with “the man makes a…” and I thought “Surely Art Deco is not about to praise Obama’s speech.” Happily, I was not disappointed.
    I’m almost ashamed to admit that the first time or two I heard O speak, before the 2008 election, I was kind of impressed. Even thought he might make a good president. How young and idealistic I was.
    The rebuttal by the opposing party helps make the whole SOTU thing a very un-entertaining circus. “bloody mannequin”–do you mean “bloody” as in covered with blood, or as the British term for “really awful”?

  6. That was Joni Ernst, right? Never seen her on tv but in her pictures she looks like a pretty ordinary middle-class lady.

  7. No, the picture is Bridget Kelly, former deputy chief of staff to the Governor of New Jersey. Mrs. Ernst favors display smiles, beehive hairdos, and ugly ensembles.

  8. I mean the Republican speechmaker was Joni Ernst. She doesn’t seem so bad to me, though I agree Bridget Kelly is definitely more presentable. I wouldn’t call Mrs. (?) Ernt’s hairdo a beehive. I’d call this a beehive.

  9. Not for the first time, I read about something Obama said and think ““Twerp”.

  10. You know, I wouldn’t care if she had blue spiked hair and tattoos on her face if she was a good senator. I’m not sure I believe in those though.
    AMDG

  11. Ernst is newly elected, I think, so you can at least in theory entertain some hope for her.

  12. In schematic outline, she seems like a decent person and someone good to have on Capitol Hill if she does not go native. It’s just that her speech stank. She needed to articulate a Republican alternative and add some specific rebuttals on the fly. Instead she talked about her shoes (such as they were ca. 1982).

  13. “Even thought he might make a good president. How young and idealistic I was.”
    Heh!

  14. Clarityseeker

    “Even thought he might make a good president. How young and idealistic I was.”

    It sounds like an admission of regret, in having voted for him.
    {{{Silent Moment}}}

  15. Actually that was just a joke–I didn’t vote for him. My notion that he might make a good president was very fleeting, and was gone by the time he was nominated. The most nearly positive thing I would have said about him in 2008 was that he would have been better than Hillary. About which I’m not at all sure now.

Leave a reply to Louise Cancel reply