52 Authors: Week 26 – E.B. White

E.B. White was a great comic novelist. In working on this piece I read his trilogy of fantasy animals twice, and came away with the conviction that these are comic masterpieces. They are of course fantasy novels, in which animals talk and write. The fantasy world of these novels belongs within the genre of comedy. Re-reading E.B. White's trilogy was like the experience I had when our local arts cinema in Aberdeen had a season of Jaques Tati movies. I had seen them all individually, but now I saw them all again, serially, over a few months. The total experience was one of uplift – the natural equivalent of grace. I felt something similar in my re-immersion in White's comic-fantasy world. It is a world which steeps the reader in a kind of 'natural grace'.

I dare say some reader will point out that 'natural grace' is a contradiction in terms but I shall be on my way to Santiago of Compostella and unable to return fire.

StuartLittle

Stuart Little is the first of the three, published in 1945. Of the three, this one is the least of a 'children's book'. Now, I know that someone could say that any good children's book is equally a children's book and an adult's book: it is simply a good book a child could read too. In fact, someone did say that to me, and perhaps she is right. But to me, Stuart Little comes across as a pure joke. The joke is that Mrs. Little gives birth to a mouse, who from birth has the habits and demeanour of a man. This is taken with absolute seriousness, and there is no attempt at all to get the reader affectively to empathize with Stuart and his diminutive condition. There is no 'emotion' in this book. Stuart is depicted with rather a cold eye. There's no warmth here, in the way that we see warmth in Charlotte's Web.

The Little family, Stuart's parents and older brother George are depicted as ineffective in their efforts to accommodate a mouse as family member. They cheerfully use Stuart's size to their advantage, sending him down drains, and using him to rescue ping-pong balls. Stuart's mother cries for him, but Stuart is never really a member of the family. And that is exactly how it would be, if a woman gave birth to a mouse. This is part of the greatness of E.B.White's comic imagination. On the one hand, the greatest extremes of lyrical fantasy. But on the other hand and simultaneously, there is a stoical realism about human nature and its foibles.

Charlotte'sWeb

On my first re-reading of Charlotte's Web, I was disappointed in Fern. Fern is the little girl who saves Wilbur the pig's life by refusing to allow her father, Mr. Arable, to take an axe to the runt. She raises him. And then, in Wilbur's very moment of triumph, at the end of the book, when he is given the Fairground medal which saves his life, Fern has lost interest. She has gone to the Ferris Wheel with a boy. Fern has grown up over the book, growing out of her love for the farmyard animals amongst whom she once sat for hours. A boy, Henry Furry, is now more interesting to her than Wilbur. On re-reading the book, I realized that this is E.B. White's great realism at work: the way of the world is that Fern will grow up, and take more interest in humans, and human love, than in animals. Anything else would have been a dreadful fate for the girl. Imagine a 40-year-old Fern Arable, still sitting around the pig pen!

And so it is throughout Charlotte's Web. It is a much more affective and in some ways a more sentimental book than Stuart Little. Surely most of its readers simply do not want Wilbur the pig to die, and recall it as the tale of a pig's triumph over being made into bacon. But the truth is that Charlotte, who saves Wilbur, dies on the night after her protege's triumph. Spiders live only a short while, and the book remains true to this fact of life. The book describes Charlotte, dying alone, in the fairground, after everyone else has gone home. Nothing else could have happened. The pig could not have resisted being forced into his box and driven back to the farm. That is the way animals live, and for all their talking and writing, E.B. White sticks with the laws of animal life. One of the most refreshing aspects of Charlotte's Web and The Trumpet of the Swan is their depictions of the natural life of the seasons.

Stuart Little is a kind of comic version of the Blue Flower. It ends as Stuart begins his journey in search of a bird whom he has loved and who is now clearly unobtainable. Nonetheless Stuart sets out boldly in quest of the unattainable.

Charlotte's Web is about a spider saving Wilbur the pig's life by making the farmers think HE is miraculous by weaving praise of him in her web. The true miracle, that a spider can write 'radiant' in her web, goes unnoticed.

Trumpet_of_the_Swan_Cover

The Trumpet of the Swan is the last and funniest of the three books. The funniest character is Louis' father. The cob is a great idealist. He steals a trumpet for his mute son Louis and yearns to repay his debt to the music store and restore his honour. He gives grandiloquent speeches, thus creating the opportunity for take-downs by his wife. My favourite is when the cob says 'I glide swanlike' and his wife snaps 'You are not likely to glide mooselike'.

No comic hero ever smiles, or laughs or apparently sees the joke of himself. That is why animals make perfect comic heroes: it is entirely realistic for neither Stuart nor the cob nor Louis to recognize how funny their aspirations are.

—Grumpy is a professor of theology in the Midwest.


,

6 responses to “52 Authors: Week 26 – E.B. White”

  1. El Gaucho

    My first name is “Stuart” so of course Stuart Little was a book I owned as a child. I even remember kids calling me that occasionally, though I was not diminutive, just because school kids must all find a way to tease one another. Stuart is never a popular name, no matter which decade you are growing up in (and this was the 70s). So I read and enjoyed Stuart Little and also Charlotte’s Web, and then never returned to them. I feel mildly aware that The Trumpet and the Swan existed, before I read this post. Many of you have spent some time on Children’s Literature, and I suppose it is a failing of mine, but I have never been interested since probably reaching Junior High age. I’ve never read any Narnia, and I quickly ran out of steam after Harry Potter number 2. The Hobbit is probably the only book I have returned to that can be categorized as for children, at least in that it is so completely different in tone than LOTR. So enough about my shortcomings. Excellent post. I need to return to EB White as an adult. I also like the idea (as of the Tati movies) of reading all three and looking back to see what they mean to you collectively.

  2. For what it’s worth, I’m the same way about children’s lit in general. I wouldn’t be surprised if there tends to be a male-female divergence on this. I didn’t encounter E.B. White until I had children of my own, and to tell the truth didn’t really find these books that interesting. To tell an even worse truth, I’m not sure I ever even finished one. Maybe Charlotte’s Web. Grumpy makes them sound more interesting.
    I did enjoy the Stuart Little movie.

  3. I was waiting for Grumpy to destroy my contention that magical realism is a good thing, and she didn’t even halfway try. 🙂
    Y’all should keep her in your prayers while she is walking.
    AMDG

  4. Robert Gotcher

    I also didn’t read any White until I had kids. Haven’t read Stuart yet.
    It is interesting to compare how White treats a girl coming into adolescence and how Lewis deals with Susan’s in Narnia. Not to mention how Pixar is going to deal with Riley’s puberty in Inside Out Two.
    I found Trumpet to be one or two ticks over the too weird line. Something about the night club scene in Philly, I guess. Maybe Louis is supposed to be named after Louis Armstrong?
    I like Charlotte a lot, but I’m not sure I could explain what it is supposed to mean.
    Amy Welborn’s blog is called “Charlotte Was Both,” after the last line in the book. That closing line makes one long for the days when friends used to write letters to each other.
    sigh!

  5. I wrote an actual letter, with a pen, on paper, a couple of months or so ago. It was somewhat difficult to do, and I’m afraid parts of it were illegible.
    But I miss it, too. I was reading a few days ago a review of the 8th volume of Henry James’s collected letters. There are going to be 140 volumes. 10,423 letters.

  6. My last foray into letter writing was when a friend moved to Texas. I don’t think I had the internet then. I wrote her every month, and though she called sometimes, she never wrote back.
    AMDG

Leave a reply to Mac Cancel reply